HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 103/5/1696    most recent 00698.2007v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bates, J. H. T. Articles by Lundblad, L. K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bates, J. H. T. Articles by Lundblad, L. K. A.

Bronchodilatory effect of deep inspiration on the dynamics of bronchoconstriction in mice

Vermont Lung Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont

Submitted 29 June 2007 ; accepted in final form 30 August 2007

We recently developed a computational model of an airway embedded in elastic parenchyma (Bates JH, Lauzon AM. J Appl Physiol 102: 1912–1920, 2007) that accurately mimics the time dependence of airway resistance on tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) following methacholine injection in normal animals. In the present study, we compared the model predictions of bronchodilation induced by a deep inflation (DI) of the lung following administration of the bronchial agonist methacholine to corresponding experimental measurements made in mice. We found that a DI in mice caused an immediate reduction in airway resistance when it was administered soon after intravenous injection of methacholine, while the airway smooth muscle was in the process of contracting. However, the magnitude of the reduction in resistance was greater and its subsequent rate of increase less than that predicted by the model. We found that this effect was most pronounced when the DI was given within 3 s following methacholine injection, again in contrast to the predictions of the model. The reduction of airway resistance was virtually independent of the rate of lung inflation during the DI, however, which agrees with model predictions. We conclude that while the model accounts for a substantial fraction of the post-DI reduction in airway resistance seen experimentally, there remain important differences between prediction and experiment that suggest that the effects of a DI are not simply due to eccentric contraction of the airway smooth muscle.

airway smooth muscle; airways hyperresponsiveness; airway-parenchymal interdependence; computational model