Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 103: 1662-1668, 2007. First published August 2, 2007; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00620.2007
8750-7587/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/5/1662    most recent
00620.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oliven, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tov, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oliven, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tov, N.

Effect of coactivation of tongue protrusor and retractor muscles on pharyngeal lumen and airflow in sleep apnea patients

Arie Oliven,1 Majed Odeh,1 Louis Geitini,1 Ron Oliven,1 Uri Steinfeld,1 Alan R. Schwartz,2 and Nave Tov1

1Bnai Zion Medical Center, Technion, Haifa, Israel; and 2The Johns Hopkins Sleep Disorders Center, Baltimore, Maryland

Submitted 10 June 2007 ; accepted in final form 27 July 2007

The present study evaluated the effect of coactivation of tongue protrusors and retractors on pharyngeal patency in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The effect of genioglossus (GG), hyoglossus (HG), and coactivation of both on nasal pressure (Pn):flow relationships was evaluated in a sleep study (SlS, n = 7) and during a propofol anesthesia study (AnS, n = 7). GG was stimulated with sublingual surface electrodes in SlS and with intramuscular electrodes in AnS, while HG was stimulated with surface electrodes in both groups. In the AnS, the cross-sectional area (CSA):Pn relationships was measured with a pharyngoscope to estimate velopharyngeal compliance . In the SlS, surface stimulation of GG had no effect on the critical pressure (Pcrit), HG increased Pcrit from 2.8 ± 1.7 to 3.7 ± 1.6 cmH2O, but coactivation lowered Pcrit to 0.2 ± 1.9 cmH2O (P < 0.01 for both). In the AnS, intramuscular stimulation of GG lowered Pcrit from 2.6 ± 1.3 to 1.0 ± 2.8 cmH2O, HG increased Pcrit to 6.2 ± 2.5 cmH2O (P < 0.01), and coactivation had a similar effect to that of GG (Pcrit = 1.2 ± 2.4 cmH2O, P < 0.05). None of the interventions affected significantly velopharyngeal compliance. We conclude that the beneficial effect of coactivation depends on the pattern of GG fiber recruitment: although surface stimulation of GG failed to protrude the tongue, it prevented the occlusive effect of the retractor, thereby improving pharyngeal patency during coactivation. Stimulation of deeper GG fibers with intramuscular electrodes enlarged the pharynx, and coactivation had no additive effect.

tongue muscles; sleep apnea; pharynx; genioglossus; hyoglossus



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. Oliven, Dept. of Internal Medicine, Bnai Zion Medical Center, 47 Golomb St., Haifa, Israel (e-mail: oliven{at}tx.technion.ac.il)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. M. McGinley, A. R. Schwartz, H. Schneider, J. P. Kirkness, P. L. Smith, and S. P. Patil
Upper airway neuromuscular compensation during sleep is defective in obstructive sleep apnea
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2008; 105(1): 197 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.