HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 103/1/190    most recent 00139.2007v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Leary, D. S. Articles by Ichinose, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by O'Leary, D. S. Articles by Ichinose, M.

Muscle metaboreflex-induced increases in cardiac sympathetic activity vasoconstrict the coronary vasculature

Departments of ¹Physiology and ²Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan; and ³Laboratory for Applied Human Physiology, Faculty of Human Development, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan

Submitted 1 February 2007 ; accepted in final form 23 April 2007

Ischemia of active skeletal muscle evokes a powerful blood pressure-raising reflex termed the muscle metaboreflex (MMR). MMR activation increases cardiac sympathetic nerve activity, which increases heart rate, ventricular contractility, and cardiac output (CO). However, despite the marked increase in ventricular work, no coronary vasodilation occurs. Using conscious, chronically instrumented dogs, we observed MMR-induced changes in arterial pressure, CO, left circumflex coronary blood flow (CBF), and coronary vascular conductance (CVC) before and after ₁-receptor blockade (prazosin, 100 µg/kg iv). MMR was activated during mild treadmill exercise by partially reducing hindlimb blood flow. In control experiments, MMR activation caused a substantial pressor response-mediated via increases in CO. Although CBF increased (+28.1 ± 3.7 ml/min; P < 0.05), CVC did not change (0.45 ± 0.05 vs. 0.47 ± 0.06 ml·min^–1·mmHg^–1, exercise vs. exercise with MMR activation, respectively; P > 0.05). Thus all of the increase in CBF was due to the increase in arterial pressure. In contrast, after prazosin, MMR activation caused a greater increase in CBF (+55.9 ± 17.1 ml/min; P < 0.05 vs. control) and CVC rose significantly (0.59 ± 0.08 vs. 0.81 ± 0.17 ml·min^–1·mmHg^–1, exercise vs. exercise with MMR activation, respectively; P < 0.05). A greater increase in CO also occurred (+2.01 ± 0.1 vs. +3.27 ± 1.1 l/min, control vs. prazosin, respectively; P < 0.05). We conclude that the MMR-induced increases in sympathetic activity to the heart functionally restrain coronary vasodilation, which may limit increases in ventricular function.

exercise pressor response; coronary blood flow; ventricular function; prazosin; -adrenergic receptors