HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 102/4/1341    most recent 01018.2006v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Laye, M. J. Articles by Booth, F. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Laye, M. J. Articles by Booth, F. W.

Inactivity induces increases in abdominal fat

Departments of ¹Medical Pharmacology and Physiology, ²Nutritional Sciences, ³Internal Medicine, ⁴Biomedical Sciences, ⁵Dalton Cardiovascular Center, and ⁶Health Activity Center, University of Missouri; and ⁷Harry S. Truman Veterans Memorial Hospital, Columbia, Missouri

Submitted 12 September 2006 ; accepted in final form 13 November 2006

Previously, inducing inactivity for 53 h after 21 days of voluntary running resulted in a 25 and 48% increase in epididymal and omental fat pad weights, respectively, while rats continued to eat more than a group that never had access to a running wheel (J Physiol 565: 911–925, 2005). We wanted to test the hypothesis that inactivity, independent of excessive caloric intake, could induce an increase in fat pad mass. Twenty-one-day-old rats were given access to voluntary running wheels for 42–43 days so that they were running 9 km/day in the last week of running, after which wheels were locked for 5, 53, or 173 h (WL5, WL53, WL173) before the rats were killed. During the 53 and 173 h of inactivity, one group of animals was pair fed (PF) to match sedentary controls, whereas the other continued to eat ad libitum (AL). Epididymal and retroperitoneal fat masses were significantly increased in the WL173-PF vs. the WL5 group, whereas epididymal, perirenal, and retroperitoneal fat masses were all significantly increased in the WL173-AL group compared with the WL5 group. Additionally, hyperplasia, and not hypertrophy, of the epididymal fat mass was responsible for the increase at WL173-AL as demonstrated by a significant increase in cell number vs. WL5, with no change in cell diameter or volume. Thus two important findings have been elucidated: 1) increases in measured abdominal fat masses occur in both AL and PF groups at WL173, and 2) adipocyte expansion via hyperplasia occurred with an ad libitum diet following cessation of voluntary running.

exercise; obesity; food; hyperplasia

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. T. Morris, M. J. Laye, S. J. Lees, R. S. Rector, J. P. Thyfault, and F. W. Booth Exercise-induced attenuation of obesity, hyperinsulinemia, and skeletal muscle lipid peroxidation in the OLETF rat J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 708 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Patterson, A. A. Dunn-Meynell, and B. E. Levin Three weeks of early-onset exercise prolongs obesity resistance in DIO rats after exercise cessation Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R290 - R301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Kotz Rewired to be thin? When exercise hits the brain Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R288 - R289. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. K. Roberts Inactivity and fat cell hyperplasia: fat chance? J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2007; 102(4): 1308 - 1309. [Full Text] [PDF]