HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 102/3/992    most recent 00425.2006v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chen, T. C. Articles by Sacco, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chen, T. C. Articles by Sacco, P.

Intensity of eccentric exercise, shift of optimum angle, and the magnitude of repeated-bout effect

¹Department of Physical Education, National Chiayi University, Chiayi County, Taiwan; ²School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia, Australia; and ³School of Health and Bioscience, University of East London, London, United Kingdom

Submitted 11 April 2006 ; accepted in final form 22 November 2006

This study compared the effect of four different intensities of initial eccentric exercise (ECC1) on optimum angle shift and extent of muscle damage induced by subsequent maximal eccentric exercise. Fifty-two male students were placed into 100%, 80%, 60%, or 40% groups (n = 13 per group), performing 30 eccentric actions of the elbow flexors of 100%, 80%, 60%, or 40% of maximal isometric strength [maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)] for ECC1, followed 2–3 wk later by a similar exercise (ECC2) that used 100% MVC load. MVC at six elbow joint angles, range of motion, upper arm circumference, serum creatine kinase activity, myoglobin concentration, and muscle soreness were measured before and for 5 days following ECC1 and ECC2. A rightward shift of optimum angle following ECC1 was significantly (P < 0.05) greater for the 100% and 80% than for the 60% and 40% groups, and it decreased significantly (P < 0.05) from immediately to 5 days postexercise. By the time ECC2 was performed, only the 100% group kept a significant shift (4°). Changes in most of the criterion measures following ECC1 were significantly greater for the 100% and 80% groups compared with the 60% and 40% groups. Changes in the criterion measures following ECC2 were significantly (P < 0.05) greater for the 40% group compared with other groups. Although the magnitude of repeated bout effect following ECC2 was significantly (P < 0.05) smaller for the 40% and 60% groups, all groups showed significantly (P < 0.05) reduced changes in criterion measures following ECC2 compared with the ECC1 100% bout. We conclude that the repeated-bout effect was not dependent on the shift of optimum angle.

muscle damage; maximal isometric strength; length-tension relationship; delayed-onset muscle soreness; elbow flexors

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Jubeau, A. Sartorio, P. G. Marinone, F. Agosti, J. V. Hoecke, K. Nosaka, and N. A. Maffiuletti Comparison between voluntary and stimulated contractions of the quadriceps femoris for growth hormone response and muscle damage J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2008; 104(1): 75 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]