Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 102: 673-680, 2007. First published October 26, 2006; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00917.2006
8750-7587/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/673    most recent
00917.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peckham, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tsokos, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peckham, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tsokos, G. C.

C5-blocking antibody reduces fluid requirements and improves responsiveness to fluid infusion in hemorrhagic shock managed with hypotensive resuscitation

Russell M. Peckham,1,2 Michael T. Handrigan,1 Timothy B. Bentley,1 Michael J Falabella,1 Andrew D. Chrovian,1 Gregory L. Stahl,3 and George C. Tsokos1,2

1Department of Cellular Injury, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland; 2Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda; and 3Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Center for Experimental Therapeutics and Reperfusion Injury, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Submitted 21 August 2006 ; accepted in final form 12 October 2006

Hypotensive resuscitation strategies and inhibition of complement may both be of benefit in hemorrhagic shock. We asked if C5-blocking antibody (anti-C5) could diminish the amount of fluid required and improve responsiveness to resuscitation from hemorrhage. Awake, male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent controlled hemorrhage followed by prolonged (3 h) hypotensive resuscitation with lactated Ringer’s or Hextend, with or without anti-C5. Anti-C5 treatment led to an estimated 62.3 and 58.5% reduction in the volume of Hextend and lactated Ringer’s, respectively. In the subgroup of animals with a positive mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to fluid infusion following prolonged hypotension, anti-C5 treatment led to an estimated 4.7- and 4.1-fold increase in mean arterial pressure response per unit Hextend and lactated Ringer’s infused, respectively. We observed no significant postresuscitation metabolic differences between the anti-C5 groups and controls. Whether anti-C5 could serve as a volume-sparing adjunct that improves responsiveness to fluid administration in humans deserves further study.

complement; shock; resuscitation; hypotensive resuscitation



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. M. Peckham, 503 Robert Grant Ave., Rm. 1A32, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (e-mail: russell.m.peckham{at}us.army.mil)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.