HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 101/4/1262    most recent 00561.2006v2 00561.2006v1 Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rothe, C. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rothe, C. F.

POINT-COUNTERPOINT

Point-Counterpoint: Active venoconstriction is/is not important in maintaining or raising end-diastolic volume and stroke volume during exercise and orthostasis

Department Cellular and Integrative Physiology
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana
e-mail: crothe{at}iupui.edu

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE POINT:COUNTERPOINT DEBATES: This series of debates was initiated for the Journal of Applied Physiology because we believe an important means of searching for truth is through debate where contradictory viewpoints are put forward. This dialectic process whereby a thesis is advanced, then opposed by an antithesis, with a synthesis subsequently arrived at, is a powerful and often entertaining method for gaining knowledge and for understanding the source of a controversy.

Before reading these Point:Counterpoint manuscripts or preparing a brief commentary on the content, the reader should understand that authors on each side of the debate are expected to advance a polarized viewpoint and to select the most convincing data to support their position. This approach differs markedly from the review article where the reader expects the author to present balanced coverage of the topic. Each of the authors has been strictly limited in the lengths of both the manuscript (1,200 words) and the rebuttal (400). The number of references to publications is also limited to 30, and citation of unpublished findings is prohibited.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. F. Rothe Commentary on Viewpoint "Human experimentation: No accurate, quantitative data?" J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 1289 - 1289. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. D. Sheriff, R. A. Augustyniak, and D. S. O'Leary Active venoconstriction is/is not important in maintaining or raising end-diastolic volume and stroke volume during exercise and orthostasis J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1531 - 1531. [Full Text] [PDF]