HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 101/3/898    most recent 00126.2006v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mendias, C. L. Articles by Faulkner, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mendias, C. L. Articles by Faulkner, J. A.

Contractile properties of EDL and soleus muscles of myostatin-deficient mice

Departments of ¹Molecular and Integrative Physiology, ²Biomedical Engineering, and ³Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Submitted 2 February 2006 ; accepted in final form 10 May 2006

Myostatin is a negative regulator of muscle mass. The impact of myostatin deficiency on the contractile properties of healthy muscles has not been determined. We hypothesized that myostatin deficiency would increase the maximum tetanic force (P_o), but decrease the specific P_o (sP_o) of muscles and increase the susceptibility to contraction-induced injury. The in vitro contractile properties of extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus muscles from wild-type (MSTN^+/+), heterozygous-null (MSTN^+/–), and homozygous-null (MSTN^–/–) adult male mice were determined. For EDL muscles, the P_o of both MSTN^+/– and MSTN^–/– mice were greater than the P_o of MSTN^+/+ mice. For soleus muscles, the P_o of MSTN^–/– mice was greater than that of MSTN^+/+ mice. The sP_o of EDL muscles of MSTN^–/– mice was less than that of MSTN^+/+ mice. For soleus muscles, however, no difference in sP_o was observed. Following two lengthening contractions, EDL muscles from MSTN^–/– mice had a greater force deficit than that of MSTN^+/+ or MSTN^+/– mice, whereas no differences were observed for the force deficits of soleus muscles. Myostatin-deficient EDL muscles had less hydroxyproline, and myostatin directly increased type I collagen mRNA expression and protein content. The difference in the response of EDL and soleus muscles to myostatin may arise from differences in the levels of a myostatin receptor, activin type IIB. Compared with the soleus, the amount of activin type IIB receptor was approximately twofold greater in EDL muscles. The results support a significant role for myostatin not only in the mass of muscles but also in the contractility and the composition of the extracellular matrix of muscles.

GDF-8; muscle morphology; muscle injury

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. D. Kollias and J. C. McDermott Transforming growth factor-{beta} and myostatin signaling in skeletal muscle J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 579 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Mendias, K. I. Bakhurin, and J. A. Faulkner Tendons of myostatin-deficient mice are small, brittle, and hypocellular PNAS, January 8, 2008; 105(1): 388 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]