Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 101: 500-505, 2006. First published May 4, 2006; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01399.2005
8750-7587/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/2/500    most recent
01399.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Todd, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ridding, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Todd, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ridding, M. C.

Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation decreases motor cortical excitability in humans

Gabrielle Todd, Stanley C. Flavel, and Michael C. Ridding

Research Centre for Human Movement Control, School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Submitted 4 November 2005 ; accepted in final form 19 April 2006

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex (rTMS) can be used to modify motor cortical excitability in human subjects. At stimulus intensities near to or above resting motor threshold, low-frequency rTMS (~1 Hz) decreases motor cortical excitability, whereas high-frequency rTMS (5–20 Hz) can increase excitability. We investigated the effect of 10 min of intermittent rTMS on motor cortical excitability in normal subjects at two frequencies (2 or 6 Hz). Three low intensities of stimulation (70, 80, and 90% of active motor threshold) and sham stimulation were used. The number of stimuli were matched between conditions. Motor cortical excitability was investigated by measurement of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) evoked by single magnetic stimuli in the relaxed first dorsal interosseus muscle. The intensity of the single stimuli was set to evoke baseline MEPs of ~1 mV in amplitude. Both 2- and 6-Hz stimulation, at 80% of active motor threshold, reduced the magnitude of MEPs for ~30 min (P < 0.05). MEPs returned to baseline values after a weak voluntary contraction. Stimulation at 70 and 90% of active motor threshold and sham stimulation did not induce a significant group effect on MEP magnitude. However, the intersubject response to rTMS at 90% of active motor threshold was highly variable, with some subjects showing significant MEP facilitation and others inhibition. These results suggest that, at low stimulus intensities, the intensity of stimulation may be as important as frequency in determining the effect of rTMS on motor cortical excitability.

motor cortex; motor evoked potential; cortical plasticity



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. Todd, Discipline of Physiology, The School of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, The Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia (e-mail: gabrielle.todd{at}adelaide.edu.au)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. Todd, N. C. Rogasch, S. C. Flavel, and M. C. Ridding
Voluntary movement and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over human motor cortex
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2009; 106(5): 1593 - 1603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
Z. Ni, C. Gunraj, and R. Chen
Short interval intracortical inhibition and facilitation during the silent period in human
J. Physiol., September 15, 2007; 583(3): 971 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.