HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weibel, E. R. Articles by Butler, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weibel, E. R. Articles by Butler, J. P.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Morphological Quantitation of Emphysema: A Debate

The following series of letters to the editor concerns a recently published morphologic method proposed by Parameswaran and colleagues for sensitive, early detection of emphysema (J Appl Physiol 100: 186–193, 2006). The validity of the proposed method was critiqued by Ewald Weibel, and, in turn, this critique was rebutted by Parameswaran et al. Additional brief commentaries were contributed by scientists working in the field. Further comments on this important topic are welcome. The following is the abstract of the article discussed in the subsequent letter:

The mean linear intercept (L_m) can be used to estimate the surface area for gas exchange in the lung. However, in recent years it is most commonly used as an index for characterizing the enlargement of airspaces in emphysema and the associated severity of structural destruction in the lung. Specifically, an increase in L_m is thought to result from an increase in airspace sizes. In this paper, we examined how accurately L_m measures the linear dimensions of airspaces from histological sections and a variety of computer-generated test images. To this end, we developed an automated method for measuring linear intercepts from digitized images of tissue sections and calculate L_m as their mean. We examined how the shape of airspaces and the variability of their sizes influence L_m as well as the distribution of linear intercepts. We found that for a relatively homogeneous enlargement of airspaces, L_m was a reliable index for detecting emphysema. However, in the presence of spatial heterogeneities with a large variability of airspace sizes, L_m did not significantly increase and sometimes even decreased compared to its value in normal tissue. We also developed an automated method for measuring the area and computed an equivalent diameter of each individual airspace that is independent of shape. Finally, we introduced new indexes based on the moments of diameter that we found to be more reliable than L_m to characterize airspace enlargement in the presence of heterogeneities.

REPLY

COMMENT

COMMENT

COMMENT

COMMENT

Physiology Program
Harvard School of Public Health
Boston, Massachusetts
e-mail: jbutler{at}hsph.harvard.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Bolle, G. Eder, S. Takenaka, K. Ganguly, S. Karrasch, C. Zeller, M. Neuner, W. G. Kreyling, A. Tsuda, and H. Schulz Postnatal lung function in the developing rat J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2008; 104(4): 1167 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Hyde, N. K. Tyler, and C. G. Plopper Morphometry of the Respiratory Tract: Avoiding the Sampling, Size, Orientation, and Reference Traps Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2007; 35(1): 41 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Fehrenbach There is no rationale to still rely on outdated, biased tools for quantitative morphology in pulmonary research Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2006; 15(101): 105 - 106. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Fehrenbach Animal models of pulmonary emphysema: a stereologist's perspective Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2006; 15(101): 136 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]