HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 100/4/1109    most recent 01303.2005v2 01303.2005v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walsh, L. D. Articles by Proske, U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Walsh, L. D. Articles by Proske, U.

Effect of eccentric exercise on position sense at the human forearm in different postures

¹Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria; and ²Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Submitted 11 October 2005 ; accepted in final form 19 December 2005

This is a study of the ability of blindfolded human subjects to match the position of their forearms before and after eccentric exercise. The hypothesis tested was that the sense of effort contributed to forearm position sense. The fall in force after the exercise was predicted to alter the relationship between effort and force and thereby induce position errors. In the arms-in-front posture, subjects had their unsupported reference arm set to one of two angles from the horizontal, 30 or 60°, and they matched its position by voluntary placement of their other arm. Matching errors were compared with a task where the arms were counterweighted, so could be moved in the vertical plane with minimal effort, and where the arms were moved in the horizontal plane. In these latter two tasks, the intention was to test whether removal of an effort sensation from holding the arm against gravity influenced matching performance. It was found that, although absolute errors for counterweighted and horizontal matching were no larger than for unsupported matching, their standard deviations, 6.1 and 6.8°, respectively, were significantly greater than for unsupported matching (4.6°), indicating more erratic matching. The eccentric exercise led, the next day, to a fall in maximum voluntary muscle torque of 15%. This was accompanied by a significant increase in matching errors for the unsupported matching task from 2.7 ± 0.5 to 0.8 ± 0.7° but not for counterweighted (1.4 ± 0.2 to –0.2°± 1.1°) or horizontal matching (–1.3 ± 0.7° to –1.8 ± 0.7°). This, it is postulated, is because the reduced voluntary torque after exercise was accompanied by a greater effort required to support the arms, leading to larger matching errors. However, effort is only able to provide positional information for unsupported matching where gravity plays a role. In gravity-neutral tasks like counterweighted or horizontal matching, a change in the effort-force relationship after exercise leaves matching accuracy unaffected.

effort; fatigue; kinesthesia; muscle spindle

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. J. Givoni, T. Pham, T. J. Allen, and U. Proske The effect of quadriceps muscle fatigue on position matching at the knee J. Physiol., October 1, 2007; 584(1): 111 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Allen, G. E. Ansems, and U. Proske Effects of muscle conditioning on position sense at the human forearm during loading or fatigue of elbow flexors and the role of the sense of effort J. Physiol., April 15, 2007; 580(2): 423 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. E. Ansems, T. J. Allen, and U. Proske Position sense at the human forearm in the horizontal plane during loading and vibration of elbow muscles J. Physiol., October 15, 2006; 576(2): 445 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Semmler and T. S. Miles Exercise, effort, and limb position sense J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2006; 100(4): 1099 - 1100. [Full Text] [PDF]