Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 100: 384-389, 2006. First published October 20, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00689.2005
8750-7587/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/2/384    most recent
00689.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aljuri, N.
Right arrow Articles by Freitag, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aljuri, N.
Right arrow Articles by Freitag, L.

Viscoelasticity of the trachea and its effects on flow limitation

Nikolai Aljuri,1,2 Jose G. Venegas,1,2 and Lutz Freitag3

1Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge; 2Department of Anaesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and 3Institute for Experimental Pneumology, Lungenklinik Hemer, Germany

To test the hypothesis that peak expiratory flow is determined by the wave-speed-limiting mechanism, we studied the time dependency of the trachea and its effects on flow limitation. For this purpose, we assessed the relationship between transmural pressure and cross-sectional area [the tube law (TL)] of six excised human tracheae under controlled conditions of static (no flow) and forced expiratory flow. We found that TLs of isolated human tracheae followed quite well the mathematical representation proposed by Shapiro (Shapiro AH. J Biomech Eng 99: 126–147, 1977) for elastic tubes. Furthermore, we found that the TL measured at the onset of forced expiratory flow was significantly stiffer than the static TL. As a result, the stiffer TL measured at the onset of forced expiratory flow predicted theoretical maximal expiratory flows far greater than those predicted by the more compliant static TL, which in all cases studied failed to explain peak expiratory flows measured at the onset of forced expiration. We conclude that the observed viscoelasticity of the tracheal walls can account for the measured differences between maximal and "supramaximal" expiratory flows seen at the onset of forced expiration.

static tube law; dynamic tube law; maximal expiratory flow; forced expiration; supramaximal flow



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: N. Aljuri, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 45 Carleton St., E25-335, Cambridge, MA 02142 (e-mail: nikko{at}mit.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.