Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol (November 5, 2009). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01246.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, C.
Right arrow Articles by Goldspink, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, C.
Right arrow Articles by Goldspink, G.
Submitted on November 4, 2009
Accepted on November 4, 2009

Point: Counterpoint "IGF is / is not the major physiological regulator of muscle mass."

Claire Stewart1*, Jennifer M. Pell2, Martin Flueck3, and Geoffrey Goldspink4

1 MMU Cheshire
2 Babraham Institute
3 Manchester Metropolitan University
4 Royal Free and University College

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.stewart{at}mmu.ac.uk.

N/A for Point: Counterpoint articles






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.