Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (June 18, 2009). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00197.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/3/887    most recent
00197.2009v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Horswill, C. A
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baker, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Horswill, C. A
Submitted on February 23, 2009
Revised on June 16, 2009
Accepted on June 17, 2009

Comparison of Regional Patch Collection vs. Whole-Body Washdown for Measuring Sweat Sodium and Potassium Loss during Exercise

Lindsay B. Baker1*, John R Stofan2, Adam A. Hamilton, and Craig A Horswill1

1 Gatorade Sports Science Institute
2 Quaker Oats Company

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lindsay.baker{at}gatorade.com.

This study compared simultaneous whole-body washdown (WBW) and regional skin surface (REG) sweat collections to generate regression equations to predict WBW sweat [Na+] and [K+] from single- and 5-site REG sweat patch collections. Athletes (10 men, 10 women) cycled in a plastic chamber for 90 min in the heat. Prior to exercise, the subject and bike were washed with deionized water. After the onset of sweating, sterile patches were attached to the forearm, back, chest, forehead, and thigh, and removed upon saturation. After exercise, the subject and bike were washed with ammonium sulfate solution to collect all sweat electrolyte loss and determine the volume of unevaporated sweat. All individual patch sites and 5-site REG (weighted for local sweat rate and body surface area) were significantly (p=0.000) correlated with WBW sweat [Na+]. The equation for predicting WBW sweat [Na+] from 5-site REG was y=0.68x+0.44 (r=0.97, ICC=0.70), and did not differ between sexes. There were sex differences in the regression results between 5-site REG and WBW sweat [K+] (men: y=0.74x+0.30, r=0.89, ICC=0.73; women: y=0.04x+3.18, r=0.03, ICC=0.00). 5-site REG sweat [Na+] and [K+] significantly overestimated that of WBW sweat (59±27 vs. 41±19 mEq/L, p=0.000 and 4.4±0.7 vs. 3.6±0.7 mEq/L, p=0.000, respectively). For both sexes, the best sites for predicting WBW sweat [Na+] and [K+] were the thigh (1±8 mEq/L<WBW, p=1.000, y=0.75x+11.37, r=0.96, ICC=0.93) and chest (0.2±0.3 mEq/L>WBW, p=1.000, y=0.76x+0.55, r=0.89, ICC=0.87), respectively. In conclusion, regression equations can be used to accurately and reliably predict WBW sweat [Na+] and [K+] from REG sweat collections when study conditions and techniques are similar to that of the present protocol.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.